Saturday, July 16, 2016

Cycle One - The Culture of Childhood

            Who would have thought that one of the major decisions of any parent would be to decide which pre-school to send their child?  I am not a parent yet but I never thought that this decision could have certain economic implications or determine how well my child will do in school later on.  Personally, childhood was a well-balanced mix of play and academics (it’s weird to think of 4-year-olds being academic!).  Regarding play and imagination, I remember being a very creative and active child.  I was always playing with dolls, played house and dress-up with my friends, and enjoyed going to the safest playground in the world – with each set of play equipment set far apart surrounded by rubber pieces which always so painfully got stuck in my sneakers. 
All of this was under the supervision of a parent or a teacher.  I never minded the supervision.  Although adults were present they never interfered in our playing or childhood squabbles.  I assumed that this childhood I experienced was the same for everyone – until this week’s readings I never really thought about others having different kinds of childhood experiences that could potentially affect how successful they were.  Thinking back, I do recall two sisters that lived across the street that my sister and I had frequent play-dates with.  These two girls were from Venezuela and were allowed to leave their home and cross the neighborhood street at a young age without parental supervision – something my American parents, and admittedly myself, would never let a young child do.
On the other hand, my childhood was filled with academics as well.  I loved learning and it was something my parents supported.  According to my mom the church-based preschool I attended taught some reading and phonics but hardly any math skills. Kindergarten through the third grade, academics was not a major part of my elementary school curriculum as I went to a Montessori school.  Student-centered play and student-interest drove what I would do each day in class.  I have said many times that I do not remember learning anything academic at that Montessori elementary school – I credit my parents with teaching me everything I learned up through the third grade.    Every summer my parents would purchase academic workbooks for my sister and I to complete and this is when I remember learning how to write, comprehend my reading, and learn procedural math skills.  Fourth grade and on, once I switched schools, I remember academic learning.  At my new school I had a desk with textbooks and tests and quizzes to take and I was thrilled with this! 
I would like to consider myself economically successful on a personal level and as a benefit to my community.  Whatever government entities or businesses invested in my early childhood education were dollars well spent.  The return I was able to give them on their investment is that I am a creative teacher in the community I grew up in.  I am on my way to earning a Masters degree so that I can learn how to be a more effective teacher and the unconventional projects and games I use in my classroom engage students and make them more critical thinkers.  Whether it was the play or academic portion of my childhood that led to the success I have today (which I am eternally grateful for) we will probably never know since I had a good balance of both worlds while growing up.  Going to a preschool that emphasized socialization and peer play and spending most of my afternoons and weekends with friends at the playground could be the reason why I am unafraid to try new instructional games and project ideas in my classroom.  As well, because academics were an ever present part of my childhood summers, maybe that is why I took high school, undergraduate studies, and now this Masters program so seriously which has led to me having a full-time job that allows me to support the economy.
Continuing on the “return on investment” theme, I wanted to hear first-hand from politicians there views on investing in early childhood education.  The statistics presented in Preschool in Three Countries Revisited were interesting – someone actually took the time to itemize and analyze the economic impact of quality early childhood education programs.  Here is a clip of a debate amongst gubernatorial candidates in Minnesota from back in 2010.  The responses of the politicians to the moderator’s question are true to form: we must be implementing researched-based instructional methods in preschool classrooms.  However, the answer given by the last candidate is the most thought provoking and logical when discussing the topic of investing in early childhood education and its potential returns.

As mentioned earlier, I have not given much thought to my culture of childhood before this week’s readings.  But after reflecting on my past, it raises questions about the culture of childhood my current students must have had.  The high school I went to was diverse but most of the students were born in America.  However, the high school I teach at has a very different atmosphere.  The work ethics and play habits of the students differ greatly than what I was exposed to in high school.  For example, the majority of the students at the school I teach at are Haitian born.  They are always playing basketball (before, during, and after school).  When I was in high school, the courts were seldom used except during P.E. class.  I went ahead and looked for some information about the early childhood education in Haiti.  The video below shows a new early childhood program schools in Haiti are adapting - of which the narrator said the program is designed to share with other schools indicating international use.  The program places an emphasis on students developing individuality - a necessary character trait in adults to support a global and strong economy.   Although this video did not answer my initial question about the traditional culture of early childhood education in Haiti, I ended up liking that this innovative program is making positive changes in one of the Western Hemisphere's poorest countries.  As one mom explained, her four year old daughter is learning how to make decisions and think independently which is needed whether children are playing with one another, studying math, reading, or writing, and out in the job market.


            I do not think there is just one answer – that would be too simple.  In order for adults to be well-rounded students they must be a part of a well-rounded curriculum and culture.  One area should not be the main focus – I feel a childhood culture can incorporate progressive instruction without losing cultural values and still allow time for students to play and engage with one another.

3 comments:

  1. Thanks for sharing the video about the Haitian pre-school, Marissa! I agree that it would be very interesting to learn more about the traditional pre-school culture in Haiti, especially given the economic difference between Haiti as a nation and the developed nations of the US and Japan/the developed, urban areas of China where the schools covered in the Tobin, Hsueh, and Karasawa book were located. In particular, it sounds to me like the focus on individuality and independent decision-making skills in this Haitian school are similar to the US values of individualistic competition and freedom that Tobin and colleagues talk about (pp. 204-205). I wonder how much the rise of such values in Haiti is tied to US cultural imperialism, especially given the historical ways that schools and schooling have been used to spread culture. At the same time, though, I also notice that this school is drawing on the knowledge embedded in students’ families and communities as something that can be a resource for their learning, which I think is an important part of valuing students’ cultures as they are. In general, this video is making me think about a lot of interesting, kind of conflicting things, and I’m with you in wondering how it compares to traditional pre-school practices in Haiti.

    Another thing that stood out to me in your post is that you mentioned the global economy and the economic reasoning behind early childhood education several times. This took me by surprise, and the emphasis on pre-school as an “investment” that will have valuable returns left me somewhat troubled. You mentioned the statistics that are cited by Tobin and colleagues – I’m guessing that you’re referring to the excerpt on p. 210? That excerpt summarizes a cost-benefit analysis of implementing pre-school programs, and concludes that it's more cost-effective to fund such programs than to deal with the resulting financial implications of not funding them. While I think that this is an excellent side-benefit of funding pre-schools, I’m put off by the idea that this should be a major reason for doing so. If it was cheaper to simply throw more criminals in jail (given that low pre-school enrollment correlates to higher crime rates, I guess, based on how this excerpt is framed), would that make it a “better” choice not to fund pre-schools? Reasoning like this ignores the fact that, entirely separate from issues of cost, implementing pre-school programs can improve the lives and future prospects of students. Thinking about arguments for or against implementing pre-school programs makes me think of the Ford Pinto controversy (although obviously on a much smaller, less horrific scale) – shouldn’t human good be more important than economics?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Also related to schools and financial concerns, I noticed that two of the candidates in the first video you shared mentioned the idea of partnering with private institutions to fund pre-school programs. While there are plenty such partnerships with positive outcomes, there are also lots of instances of, for example, private organizations trying to “fix” schools without any of the training or experience needed to make informed choices about what schools need, people using public education funding as a way to make money on the backs of students, and companies taking advantage of public funding for schools to improve their own workforce. I think we need to be skeptical of private interests getting involved with public education in a global economy where many organizations are focused on their own bottom line above all else.

      Delete
  2. Hi Marissa,

    Thanks for your post! I really enjoyed everything you stated and the links you shared.

    I was really interested in your own experiences. For one, your suggestion that you are more adventuresome as a teacher because you had a more adventuresome childhood makes a lot of sense. I also think it's so cool the decisions your parents made. To allow school to really cultivate passion, interest and initiative while they took charge of some of the basics over the summer!

    One thing that struck me is how you state you don't remember learning academics at your Montessori school. I wonder if that is a good or bad thing. By which I mean, maybe they did such a good job of integrating academics into play that you don't recall learning. I know some of my best teaching, the students say at the end, "that didn't even feel like learning!" We have so equated academics with drill in our country that it's hard to know what impression a truly integrated impression would leave on a child! Maybe you were able to learn on your own over the summer (with parental help) because your school laid the right foundation?

    We probably will never know these things. They are hard to untangle. Where we all seem to agree is that balance, integration, and well roundedness are things we should continue to seek in our children's education.

    It's weird for us to think about 4-year-olds being academic (and it is for me too!) because we equate academics with something divorced from play and social relationship. A lot of thinkers, such as John Dewey or Maria Montessori, would question that assumption. They would see as much academic learning in doing a puzzle as in doing a math worksheet (or at least see equal potential in both).

    So the question you raise for me still remains: What does academic learning look like and what type of experience best provides it for kids?

    Great post!

    Kyle

    ReplyDelete