Before
For this cycle I wanted to reflect
some on what I think I will be reading as I peruse Richard Rodriguez’s Hunger of Memory. Based on Professor
Greenwalt’s blogpost, one common theme that will be presented in the text is
that of education serving as a gain as well as a loss. I wanted
to reflect on my own students and the culture of my school. I see these paradoxes in real life almost immediately. Cultural representation is abundant at my
school with an annual student multicultural show, “Flag Day” as
part of the high school’s homecoming week, and announcements made celebrating
profound historic figures during Black and Hispanic Heritage Month. While the school system is taking the time to
educate our students on each other’s differences to keep an air of inclusion,
the school system is also taking away from our diverse students their native
language, familiar foods, and sometimes even their family-given names. What have we taught out students with these
often government-mandated actions?
Possibly that these cultural-rich students should be stripped of their
wealth so that they can blend in and let their peers admire
their rich heritages from afar. This
idea is something I have just come to realize and it is disheartening. Below are my reflections after reading
Rodriguez’s book, as well as the other articles.
After
I would
like to know how to get Richard Rodriguez’s Hunger
of Memory to become a mandatory read for every teacher, administrator, and
politician who is involved in the decision-making aspect of ELL laws and
mandates! After reading Rodriguez’s book
I was at a loss – how many other students feel this way about cultural
assimilation and affirmative action? Rodriguez's writing is filled with the many paradoxes of cultural assimilation that many do
not think of. The most profound moment
had to be when Richard realized that he could not represent the Hispanic,
minority, disadvantaged community because he was not like them because of the
benefits he ended up receiving for being a Hispanic minority.
From my undergraduate studies and Google
searches to find supplemental resources for this post, the popular results
represent the benefits and on-paper success of immigrant and minority students
working their way through the public school and postsecondary school
systems. The problem is that most of
these articles and reports are from the point of view of educational
professionals and university researchers – not the students subjected to the government programs of constant ELL testing and university
acceptance based on statistical quotas and not merits. The pros and cons of affirmative action have
been in the news recently given the Supreme Courts decision to uphold
affirmative action back in June.
However, Rodriguez’s work brings to light the irony behind this social
justice movement to fix a social injustice by making the situation even more
unjust for all involved. I never thought
that the races benefitting from affirmative action would feel so conflicted by
it as many white students do. The mix of
emotions shared by Rodriguez as job offers were piling up on his desk was
somewhat comforting – on both sides of the spectrum affirmative action is not
always well received. This should be our
first hint that the system can be remodeled – hopefully with the opinions of
those most affected by it at the center of the conversation.
Affirmative action, and cultural assimilation, is not just an American issue. Great Britain faces the same situation regarding affirmative action related to increasing the number of unrepresented lower class citizens in universities and public colleges. The article mentions the academic side of
affirmative action – how schools using affirmative action tend to have
lower test scores and inflated grades skewing the intent of affirmative action
altogether. But, I wonder how the lower
class students feel as they study at a university, become more educated, and slowly
start to become unrepresentative of the family and community they left back at
home? I would think that these students
would take great pride in being able to provide a better life for themselves and
their families through university study – but how heartbreaking would it be if
they feel that they are being transformed into an individual who can no longer
connect with loved ones or represent the people with whom they grew up with?
It is refreshing, somewhat, to know
that students affected by cultural assimilation in the school system or
affirmative action do not permanently feel conflicted. As Russell Contreras mentioned as a quote
from Rodriguez, Hunger of Memory
is only a snapshot of what Rodriguez was experiencing as he worked his way
through school. I have worked with ELL
students of all different levels. I have
seem some of the most proficient English speakers exit the program and seem
cheerful when conversing in the classroom in English but talking with their
friends in the parking lot in Spanish.
But I have also seen the those just entering the program look
downtrodden and out of place in an American classroom. After the course readings this week, I have
realized how much more a responsibility I have when working with ELL students:
to encourage learning and growth by acquiring a second language but also
celebrating the unique culture and values they bring into the classroom
environment simultaneously. High school ELL education
may only be a quick picture in the lives of my students, but I want to make it
one that brings fond memories when they look back on it.
Admittedly, I was a bit morose after reading Hunger or Memory and was offended almost as much as Contreras was upon reading his book review. How could Rodriguez write such a profound account of his life and then brush it off as just one piece of the puzzle making up his life and career? So, to bring some light to the readings this week, I found this humorous clip of an instructor trying to manage an adult ELL class at a community college. The actors accurately portray, in a lighthearted manner, the difficulties presented by the inconsistencies of the English language as well as represent a diverse group of ELLs present in most of our classrooms.
Most schools offer these type of
classes to students to support English language acquisition as they pick it up
and use it in traditional classes.
However, the loss of the native language is one of the downsides of cultural
assimilation Rodriguez discusses in his book.
Ethnic classes discussed in Phippens article could be a happy medium for
ELL and traditional students. Education,
just like everything else, needs to be well balanced in order to be successful
and sustainable. Ethnic studies that let
students learn English and discuss and research their culture and
history proved to be popular and in demand in the American southwest. I would love to see these types of classes in
my school district! My district serves a
large Haitian and Hispanic population and students could learn research and writing
skills in the context of studying theirs and different ethnicities - which
would hopefully help them feel less like they are being torn away from the
culture they are familiar with and love.
References
Contreras, R. (2002,
July 19). Brown Like Us? Texas Observer.
Retrieved from: https://www.texasobserver.org/836-book-review-brown-like-us/
Phippen, J.W. (2015, July 19). How One Law Banning
Ethnic Studies Led to its Rise. The
Atlantic.
Retrieved from: http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2015/07/how-one-law- banning-ethnic-studies-led-to-rise/398885/
Retrieved from: http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2015/07/how-one-law- banning-ethnic-studies-led-to-rise/398885/
Rodriguez, R. (1982). Hunger of Memory: The Education of Richard Rodriguez. Boston:
Bantam Books.
Hi Marissa,
ReplyDeleteThank you for your post! I enjoyed reading it.
You raise a lot of good points here. To start with, I like your point about reworking affirmative action with particular attention to the thoughts and experiences of those whom it is supposed to benefit. And I don't know what we really know about this.
First off, to people who make it into college feel guilt about leaving people from their communities behind? Do they feel like they maybe didn't "earn" their degrees (when they most definitely did).
I mean, especially since "Hispanic" is a made-up category (all of them are made up, but this one is particularly weird, along with "Asian"). Do people even want to have to check this box in order to be considered for such programs? Do they have to put themselves into a box in order to be helped?
For a long time, we assumed, perhaps rightly, that everyone was middle class, and that our government therefore should help those few who weren't there. The problem now is that the middle class is seemingly disappearing. It creates a lot of resentment when we direct government programs at the relatively few when it is the many who are in need of help.
Our country has come to equate government support with being poor. (I remember my mom always refused free and reduced lunch, even though we were eligible, because she didn't want to take a hand out.) Contrast this with other countries that support each family, just for having children, with a direct government subsidy.
These are such interesting questions you bring up. I'm glad they have redoubled your commitment to making the ELL experience a good one. I'm hopeful we can create a system where support is given however and to whoever needs it--without the need to check a box.
Our complicated histories just can't fit in those boxes!
Thanks for your post,
Kyle